• Publications
    Expected Returns Articles
  • Research
    Companies Funds Top 40 My Studies
  • Stock Screen
    New Stock Screen Manage Screens
  • Dashboards
    My Dashboards New Dashboard
  • Forum
  • Events
  • Search
  • Contact Us
  • Sign In

Funds & Featured Portfolios

  • « First
  • ‹ Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Next ›
  • Last »
Buffalo Discovery by Cy Lynch Feb 01, 2013

BUFTX managers seek long-term capital growth by investing in a “broad range of companies in a diversified group of industries that are expected to benefit from innovation.”

Hoard vs. Herds by Cy Lynch Jan 01, 2013

Add iShares Dow Jones US Oil Equipment (IEZ)

Hoard vs. Herds by Cy Lynch Dec 01, 2012

Add iShares Dow Jones US Oil Equipment (IEZ)

Guggenheim S&P 500 Equal Technology by Cy Lynch Nov 01, 2012

With this month’s selection we capitalize on the outsized opportunity we see in the technology sector, while avoiding overemphasis on AAPL.

Hoard vs. Herds by Cy Lynch Oct 01, 2012

Vanguard Technology (VGT) and Vanguard Growth (VUG)

Vanguard Technology by Cy Lynch Sep 01, 2012

Among current Hoard holdings, VGT’s current PAR of 15.1% trails only that of T. Rowe Price Science & Technology.

Hoard vs. Herds by Mark Robertson Aug 01, 2012

Buy Market Vectors Coal ETF

Hoard vs. Herds by Cy Lynch Jul 01, 2012

Buy iShares DJ US Oil Equipment (IEZ)

T. Rowe Price Science & Technology by Mark Robertson Jun 01, 2012

PRSCX may be stagnant for a few months and we’ll continue to accumulate if the fundamentals remain intact.

Hoard vs. Herds by Cy Lynch May 01, 2012

Buy Price Science & Technology (PRSCX)

Fidelity Select Insurance by Cy Lynch Mar 01, 2012

For this month’s selection we turn to the non-technology fund with the highest PAR, FSPCX.

Nasdaq-100 by Cy Lynch Feb 01, 2012

This month we accumulate one of our favorite high-quality and technology laden funds.

Hoard vs. Herds by Cy Lynch Jan 01, 2012

FNI seeks to track the performance of the International Securities Exchange (ISE) ChIndia Index.

Hoard vs. Herds by Cy Lynch Dec 01, 2011

This month we accumulate one of our favorite international opportunities, ADRE.

Hoard vs. Herds by Cy Lynch Nov 01, 2011

This month we accumulate one of our balanced fund selections and go shopping for international opportunities.

Hoard vs. Herds by Cy Lynch Oct 06, 2011

Add ADRE, Accumulate Monetta

Price Science and Technology by Mark Robertson Sep 01, 2011

The performance of the Hoard portfolio has been fairly strong, generating an annualized relative return of 4.0% since January 2009.

Vanguard Technology by Cy Lynch Aug 01, 2011

Overall, VGT is a cost-effective way to gain broad exposure to technology stocks.

Fidelity Select Technology by Cy Lynch Jul 01, 2011

FSPTX is a cost-effective way to gain broad exposure to technology stocks world-wide and its solid track record and relatively experienced manager are pluses.

Monetta by Cy Lynch Jun 01, 2011

MONTX was recently added to our coverage and has the sixth highest PAR (14.0%), a healthy 6.6 points above current MIPAR.

Hoard vs. Herd by Cy Lynch May 01, 2011

Powershares QQQ stands out from the pack with the highest PAR, third highest quality and sixth highest growth of all MANIFEST-covered funds.

NASDAQ-100 by Mark Robertson Apr 01, 2011

This exchange-traded fund is one of the three most actively traded ETFs on the market. QQQ offers exposure to leading biotech and consumer discretionary firms that are traded on the NASDAQ.

Hoard vs. Herds (ONEQ) by Cy Lynch Mar 01, 2011

For the second straight month we choose Fidelity NASDAQ, a passively managed ETF holding all 2000+ stocks traded on NASDAQ.

Hoard vs. Herds: Fidelity NASDAQ by Cy Lynch Feb 01, 2011

Fidelity NASDAQ is a good alternative to QQQQ for investors seeking a more diversified NASDAQ market..

Hoard vs. Herds: VGT by Cy Lynch Jan 01, 2011

Accumulate Vanguard Technology.

© 2006 - 2025 Manifest Investing. All rights reserved.
About | Terms of Service | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

Legend
Quality Legend:
Blue Excellent with quality greater than 80.
Green Good with quality between 60 and 80.
Neutral Average or below average with quality between 20 and 60.
Red Poor with quality less than 20.
Companies with less than 10 years of history are penalized by 5 points per year.
PAR Legend:
Green PAR is within the target range of MIPAR +5-10%, currently 5.1%-10.1%
Yellow PAR is above the target range of MIPAR +10%, currently 10.1%
PAR Projected Annual Return
MIPAR The Manifest Investing Median PAR of all stocks in the database.
Company Name Legend:
* Not covered by Value Line Standard Edition.
b Uses price-to-book value for valuation purposes.
P/CF Uses price-to-cash flow for valuation.