Date: Tuesday, May 06 · 6:00 AM - 7:15 AM -12
Location: Online
Continuing our explorations of three-legged stool analysis comparing Projected Annual Return (PAR) vs. Projected Return on Value (PROVE) vs. PROJECTED cash flow growth for a number of favorites. A few thoughts about last week’s Round Table AI discussion …
© 2006 - 2025 Manifest Investing. All rights reserved.
About | Terms of Service | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
| Quality Legend: | |
|---|---|
| Blue | Excellent with quality greater than 80. |
| Green | Good with quality between 60 and 80. |
| Neutral | Average or below average with quality between 20 and 60. |
| Red | Poor with quality less than 20. |
| Companies with less than 10 years of history are penalized by 5 points per year. | |
| PAR Legend: | |
| Green | PAR is within the target range of MIPAR +5-10%, currently 5.1%-10.1% |
| Yellow | PAR is above the target range of MIPAR +10%, currently 10.1% |
| PAR | Projected Annual Return |
| MIPAR | The Manifest Investing Median PAR of all stocks in the database. |
| Company Name Legend: | |
| * | Not covered by Value Line Standard Edition. |
| b | Uses price-to-book value for valuation purposes. |
| P/CF | Uses price-to-cash flow for valuation. |